Another worrying example of bias & misuse of evidence for personal gain from a seasoned pro No nuance, no balance, & crucially no appraisal of the actual evidence + poorly written to boot. A ‘journal’ [in the loosest sense of the word] editor no less One bonus = for all to seehttps://twitter.com/whsource/status/1045047028571467776 …
-
-
He also takes the common - and deceptive - tack of "but people in the 1900s ate like this and look! No heart disease" several times, without mentioning that those people didn't live long enough to develop the disease anyway!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.