How to read a scientific paper: Methods, Results, Introduction, Conclusion, Discussion Counterintuitive, but it is by far the best thing you can do
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @GidMK
The order in which I read a paper: Abstract, Discussion, Results, References, Methods, Introduction.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
-
Replying to @GidMK
It's a logic tree of whether it's worth reporting. Abstract = short version of "Does this matter?", Discussion = long version of "Does this matter?", Results = "we actually did some work", References = "we're not making this up", Methods = boring detail of how, intro = waffle
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
Replying to @frogsandstars
It makes sense, but I would still read the results before the discussion, easy to paint numbers differently
4:28 AM - 24 Sep 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.