How to read a scientific paper: Methods, Results, Introduction, Conclusion, Discussion Counterintuitive, but it is by far the best thing you can do
-
-
It's a logic tree of whether it's worth reporting. Abstract = short version of "Does this matter?", Discussion = long version of "Does this matter?", Results = "we actually did some work", References = "we're not making this up", Methods = boring detail of how, intro = waffle
-
You would be amazed to see how often abstracts make a claim that isn’t supported by the data. This is great for activists b/c they know that people won’t read past the abstract but they can still shape opinion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.