They used a validated questionnaire that was treated with regards to inflammation markers in the body so of the criticisms I'm not sure that one's valid
I'm sure you can see the enormous issue with arguing that "meat cannot be linked to inflammation" by using anecdotes that are subject to innumerable biases, in particular survivorship bias
-
-
Anecdotes are useless for proving positive hypotheses, but serve perfectly well as counterexamples to disprove hypotheses of the general type "meat is inflammatory". You now have to argue that I'm a special snowflake if you want to claim that.
-
? Not at all. I can just say, again, that it's probably more complicated than "x food is inflammatory" and that such an attitude is probably reductionist regardless of which food you use as "x"
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.