They're putting the cart before the horse by classifying what's inflammatory and anti-inflammatory first. If they miscategorised just a couple of things the aggregates will be completely messed up.
Or inflammation is, as I said, more complex than you can easily link to individual foods Also, anecdotes are a wonderful starting point for research but useless in determining the correct answer
-
-
I'm sure you can see the enormous issue with arguing that "meat cannot be linked to inflammation" by using anecdotes that are subject to innumerable biases, in particular survivorship bias
-
Anecdotes are useless for proving positive hypotheses, but serve perfectly well as counterexamples to disprove hypotheses of the general type "meat is inflammatory". You now have to argue that I'm a special snowflake if you want to claim that.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.