Why would ancient humans be carnivorous? We descended from largely omnivorous primates, and our adaptability has been a hallmark of our evolutionary success. If we could only eat meat, we'd have far more problems
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The latest paleo-esque fad.
-
It's hard to see it as anything different, certainly
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No such thing as one paleo diet either. And whatever it was, it wasn’t carnivorous! https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-real-paleo-diet/ …
-
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/foodfeatures/evolution-of-diet/ … Meat appears to have been the preferred food but when not available, would fall back to whatever they could find.pic.twitter.com/zkY2fJyKzY
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We seem to be subject to the bio truth logical fallacy. Point is- food is better today than 40 years ago. The cave man didn’t have good sanitation, white table cloths, good wine, bad spirits, and lived a short life
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm not carnivorous but lowcarb and eat many different foods, BUT a carnivorous diet's closer to what humans ate 20,000 + years ago, than anything else. It's what the isotopes say. They don't lie. The modern "diet" would give a signal suggesting a different species in comparison.
-
I do not believe that is accurate, but even if it was it would suggest 20,000 years of human evolution e eating a non-carvivorous diet
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.