If your argument relies on an overarching conspiracy between scientists, you've either 1) Never seen more than one scientist in a room together 2) Never read more than one paper on any subject Scientists can't even conspire to co-author papers without MONTHS of argumenthttps://twitter.com/TuckerGoodrich/status/1041120006073933824 …
-
-
Very true!
-
There’s some interesting theories about those who favour conspiracy: “A small part in motivating the endorsement of…irrational beliefs,” the researchers wrote, “is the desire to stick out from the crowd.” http://time.com/4965093/conspiracy-theories-beliefs/ …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The conspiracy theory vortex of circular reasoning:"I don't have any evidence that my wild idea is right, making it even more likely that my conspiracy theory is right because the evidence is being hidden, as evidenced by the lack of evidence for my very unlikely idea".
-
Yeah well, you obviously would say that. You're one of them...You're in on it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
"People of the same trade seldom meet together... but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public..." — Adam Smith
This time they wrote a paper.
Neither of what?
