Wife showed me an amazing paper today Retrospective review of 23 cases Over a 24-year-period The first case was treated more than 2 DECADES after the last one Needless to say, it was amazingly bad, not good
-
Show this thread
-
Forget that they drew statistical conclusions from a sample of 23 (no control group) Treatment changes enormously every year Treating two cases as the same with a 24-year gap (this was for emergency surgery outcomes) is just...ridiculous
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Replying to @GidMK
Get to the punchline damnit! I demand to know the conclusions immediately so I can implement them in clinical practice tomorrow!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @drvyom
Well, it was a study in cats because she's a small animal surgeon, so I'm gonna say not eff bitterly applicable to your patients
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
*Entirely lol
3:18 PM - 15 Sep 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.