How so? If I were saying incorrect things, I would expect to be corrected
Indeed. Which conclusion specifically do you consider to be a "failure"?
-
-
I mean, the entire thing passed off two FFQs as great data to represent 20 years. Total calories were 1600, which is impossible. It wasn’t measuring low carb diets, just stuck people in buckets based off of what they reported. And they made conclusions off HRs of 1.2?!?
-
Most of those things would likely bias towards the null hypothesis. I wrote a thread about this yesterday: https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1038569107333869568 … As to the HRs, I would not consider that a failing. It is usually only in entirely new fields/small samples that this would be an error
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.