OMG - A hearing and an appeal tried to establish that the #LCHF advice given by @ProfTimNoakes was unconventional advice and failed after a lengthy hearing, which examined the science. Who appointed you as the guideline police? There is solid scientific evidence for #LCHF diets
-
-
-
"it was not proven that Noakes had acted in capacity as a doctor. And it was not a reasonable inference that he was undermining breast milk." that was the decision, nothing about lchf
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
An epidemiologist would say this. What an embarrassment.
-
How so? If I were saying incorrect things, I would expect to be corrected
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
it's for stuff like this, no one as anti-low carb.pic.twitter.com/2nTN3MOkQT
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's what epidemiologists are good at... being incorrect and misleading. Epidemiology - the 'science' of getting it wrong.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly! Tim Noakes considers me a troll and a big pharma shill (?I) for daring to ask him to clarify his claims that an LCHF diet would 'guarantee' a person not to get cancer.
-
Nothing can guarantee someone won’t get cancer. Not diet. Not exercise. Not a magical dietary supplement.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
And, although he's tried to mask it recently, is anti-vax too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t think Tim is “targeted”, rather that his public claims represent a target rich environment.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.