...to which the answer is likely “no”. The work starts when the person leaves the consultation. Real life, real time. So the “controlled” isn’t “so what” if we are seeking to translate that research to practice [and expecting similar published outcomes].
Grade C? So you have a large, well-conducted systematic review of similarly rigorous observational trials demonstrating that populations with ADG are worse off than populations without? I'd be fascinated to see it. Seriously, sounds like an amazing study
-
-
Gid, I'm trying to clarify your statement. Observational studies aren't really a "trial"as there is no intervention such as an RCT. Nations who have national food guidelines (mostly OECD nations) were ahead in food-related chronic disease.pic.twitter.com/WOLBnbHwD0
-
Your words - "an intervention isn’t achieving its objective (eg ADG, Grade C)" Grade C evidence is either a large number of observational trials pointing in the same direction + weak RCTs, or a large SR/MA with strong conclusions. I'd simply like to see this evidence
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.