None of that has the slightest bearing on whether Grade C evidence can or should be used to inform policy
Indeed. It is also how the NHMRC represents it. Based on a large body of scientific evidence, not just tradition or some such silliness
-
-
So even after critiquing the evidence you agreed with such a description? Could you point to where the NHMRC described it as such?
-
NHMRC guideline documents. Worthwhile mentioning that the ADG are, of course, made up of numerous recommendations with different levels of evidence https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/information-guideline-developers/resources-guideline-developers …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.