Sure. This is the practical application of a theoretical construct. You can decide that a certain grade of evidence is not sufficient - against the NHMRC recommendations - but applying it inconsistently makes no sense. You should apply it to all areas of evidence
No. I'm saying that there are compelling reasons to use Grade C evidence in guidelines, as outlined by the NHMRC And that you AGREE with this wrt smoking etc So using Grade C evidence as a critique makes no sense
-
-
What are the compelling reasons? Who decides? On balance with harm? On balance with doing nothing?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.