"We can only draw from the evidence available" and while the "methodology appears sound" in biomedical models of hierarchy of science and reducing bias...if the evidence is limited (which it is) then the recommendations from that science will be limited....
So if you reject all Grade C evidence, which is, I would argue, a methodologically unsound method of evidence appraisal, you should similarly be demanding furiously the RCT evidence that cigarettes cause harm and that asbestos is bad
-
-
Is the evidence for cigs causation or association?
-
*don’t even know why I’m entertaining a conversation about cigs when I’m talking about food and health.*
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.