? Many demonstrably effective medical interventions were based originally on nonsense. The point is what the evidence is ~now~, and as far as the dietary guidelines go I cannot find fault with the evidence behind them gathered in 2013https://twitter.com/WeDietitians/status/1036775894453342208 …
I did read your blog on the subject, and found it to be, at heart, a disagreement with the evidence-base for a single recommendation from a document hundreds of pages long Not exactly a fair critique in my opinion
-
-
You might be mixing my blog with another - https://ecodietitians.com.au/2017/11/23/bringing-in-the-guidelines-the-story-so-far/ … Mine says: started with a group of well-meaning statements, the evidence came second - but the evidence (the research questions) were based on those GL....so that's the first thing: evidence-self-perpetuating
-
Indeed. You critique the evidence-base for a single guideline - saturated fat - and argue that this applies equally to the entire body of evidence. While it may be a valid critique for that guideline, it's hardly fair to make such a statement of the document as a whole
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.