Question: why are the numbers in rodent studies often so low? It seems like 4 groups of 10 wouldn't be enough to prove most of the studied effects, and yet often that's the design
(Obviously this is for studies without power calcs, which is quite a few of them)
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I mean, I get the ethical issue with using to many rats and having to euthanize them, but doing a useless experiment means that all of the rats you've used are being needlessly killed so it's weird
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.