For example: two papers, one showing meat eating = weight gain the other the opposite (in rats) Weight loss: https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=meat+weight+rat&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&p=&u=%23p%3DXqzraBfsRmAJ … Weight gain: https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=meat+weight+gain+rat&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&p=&u=%23p%3Dms6-qKjdxsoJ …
-
-
Show this thread
-
This is because many preclinical findings are tested in rodents first. And regardless of whether it turns out to be useful later on, you often see at least one with a positive result
Show this thread -
The exception to this is when you're arguing "we've got lots of rodent studies that evidence this conclusion let's test it in humans to see if it works"
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not to mention it’s not physiologically normal for many rodents to eat a lot of meat
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.