You were doing quite well until you mentioned the lab versus real world research. Actually, much real world research has less applicability to the real world than does much good lab research.https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1035290781177675776 …
I would strongly disagree. The RCT I mentioned was run out of real GP clinics, with more than appropriate statistical power, excellent controls, and therefore has the advantage of both rigorous control and real-world applicability
-
-
I offer you bioequivalence as a counter example
-
Mmmm perhaps I should add the addendum "in epidemiology", I imagine there are many fields where lab-bench data is more applicable than some odd construct in a real-world setting
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.