All the arguments with low-carb advocates I've been having for the last few weeks has made me think a lot about personal bias and the importance of recognizing your own Yes, you You are biased too
So whenever a study comes out that promotes alternative medicine, I have a tendency to pick it apart with wild vigor This is unfair
-
-
The thing is, I know about this bias. I can take steps to prevent it: slow down when I read alt med studies, give them the benefit of the doubt
Show this thread -
The harder biases are the ones you aren't aware of. Took me a while to realize that I think panaceas are all nonsense, and take steps to correct for that one
Show this thread -
The point is, if you want to be a good scientist, or even just a better person, having a really good think about your own biases is pretty damn important
Show this thread -
Just to reiterate: EVERYONE HAS BIASES YES, EVEN YOU
Show this thread -
Low-carb people trash the Lancet study showing carbs to be good because of their biases. It's a reasonable piece of research that is only getting flamed because some people really don't like carbs
Show this thread -
So have a think about the decisions you make due to similar biases, because I promise you there are some
Show this thread -
And next time you are arguing with someone online, good to remember that you are probably just as blinkered as they are. Maybe not on this topic, but on something
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
When a rigorous study comes out supporting an "alternative medicine" treatment, it makes that treatment just medicine. By definition there are no studies showing an alternative treatment is effective.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.