You could, for example, point out that the absolute risk was minimal and that the practical implications have been wildly overblown by most of the people reporting on the study
It is, to be honest, fascinating watching people who don't like the results of the ARIC study argue against it Rather than engage with any number of valid criticisms, you are all trying to find that "silver bullet" to throw it away entirelyhttps://twitter.com/KetoCarnivore/status/1031171529235607553 …
-
-
Show this thread
-
You could make a strong case that the low-carb=death association is a result of residual confounding, and that it's hard to know exactly what these results mean
Show this thread -
You could note that, while low-carb may have shown a slightly increased risk of death, this is almost certainly mitigated by weightloss in a successful LCHF diet
Show this thread -
But instead, everyone is talking nonsense like "the researchers were incompetent!" It really is an amazing display of cognitive bias in action
Show this thread -
The researchers were not incompetent, the study was well-done and interesting, and making factually incorrect statements about their statistical analysis merely makes you seem ignorant
Show this thread -
P.S. another good criticism is that this study looked specifically at individuals at a high risk of atherosclerosis, thus these results may not be generalizable to your average person
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.