Lol I've done that three times now. This is getting tedious, if you aren't going to bother reading my tweets then what's the point of any of this?
-
-
You didn't, actually. You said you didn't like the conclusion, which is somewhat different from admitting the data is trash.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TuckerGoodrich @drvyom and
Health Nerd Retweeted Health Nerd
I did. Here's one of the tweetshttps://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1030969540488847360?s=19 …
Health Nerd added,
Health NerdVerified account @GidMKReplying to @TuckerGoodrich @drvyom and 2 othersThe study participants had low, but within normal (16-1700cal/day) calorie consumption There are many plausible reasons why people enrolled in a study of atherosclerosis might self-report low levels of calorie intake (I.e. diets) Your argument is bad and you should feel bad1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
1600 isn't plausible. That's the calorie intake in Keys' Starvation Experiment. "...six months of semi-starvation at 1,570 calories a day..." http://www.apa.org/monitor/2013/10/hunger.aspx … They included reported calorie intake down to 500 for women, which is a joke.pic.twitter.com/XJsKdrSQ61
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TuckerGoodrich @drvyom and
Not really. People who are dieting often report low calorie intake
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
For 25 years? Really? The initial data was assumed to be constant. Please eat 600 calories a day for 25 years and let us know how that works.


1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TuckerGoodrich @drvyom and
That's a complete strawman of my argument. Tedious in the extreme
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Tucker Goodrich Retweeted
1600-1700 calories (let alone 500!) is a starvation diet. It's not plausible that it would continue for 25 years. Their basic data and assumptions are laughable, but you accept them. https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1030969540488847360?s=19 …
Tucker Goodrich added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TuckerGoodrich @drvyom and
Yep. Never said it would continue for 25 years. That's not even an assumption made in the study, per se
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Tucker Goodrich Retweeted Tucker Goodrich
Of course it is. They only did two FFQs, per the study design. Look, if you're going to argue this stuff, at least familiarize yourself with what you are arguing for.https://twitter.com/TuckerGoodrich/status/1030281645444747264?s=19 …
Tucker Goodrich added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I know. So how, specifically, do you think the total calorie intake biased the results?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.