Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
GidMK's profile
Health Nerd
Health Nerd
Health Nerd
Verified account
@GidMK

Tweets

Health NerdVerified account

@GidMK

Epidemiologist. Writer (Guardian, Observer etc). "Well known research trouble-maker". PhDing at @UoW Host of @senscipod Email gidmk.healthnerd@gmail.com he/him

Sydney, New South Wales
theguardian.com/profile/gideon…
Joined November 2015

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 18 Aug 2018
      Replying to @TuckerGoodrich @drvyom and

      Indeed. I imagine you could get it if you applied to the study authors and had a valid reason, but it wasn't published publicly Standard practice with potentially identifiable patient data such as this. It's usually an ethical requirement, in fact

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    2. Tucker Goodrich‏ @TuckerGoodrich 18 Aug 2018
      Replying to @GidMK @drvyom and

      Raw data can anonymized easily enough, and still allow statistical validation. You still haven't addressed the starvation-level calorie intake, which invalidates the entire enterprise.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    3. Tucker Goodrich‏ @TuckerGoodrich 18 Aug 2018
      Replying to @TuckerGoodrich @GidMK and

      They also excluded the people who immediately suffered poor outcomes. "We did not update carbohydrate exposures of participants that developed heart disease, diabetes, and stroke before Visit 3"

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    4. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 18 Aug 2018
      Replying to @TuckerGoodrich @drvyom and

      I have indeed addressed your misconceptions, and you are simply describing standard epidemiological practice. This is extremely tiresome

      2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
    5. Tucker Goodrich‏ @TuckerGoodrich 18 Aug 2018
      Replying to @GidMK @drvyom and

      Tucker Goodrich Retweeted Tucker Goodrich

      Yes, hence why people who are critical thinkers conclude the field produces worthless outcomes. Thanks for confirming.https://twitter.com/TuckerGoodrich/status/993174967264169984?s=19 …

      Tucker Goodrich added,

      Tucker Goodrich @TuckerGoodrich
      ""Nutritional epidemiology is a scandal," Ioannidis told CBC News. "It should just go to the waste bin."" They get so bent out of shape when you point this out to them here on twitter! https://twitter.com/Smark_phd/status/993124445744021504 …
      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 18 Aug 2018
      Replying to @TuckerGoodrich @drvyom and

      Lol. As I said, you are shaking your fist at the sky because you dislike the study outcomes. I imagine you'd have none of these issues if the study had agreed with your preconceived beliefs

      1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
    7. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 18 Aug 2018
      Replying to @GidMK @TuckerGoodrich and

      For example, I imagine you think smoking is bad for you and that seatbelts work?

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. Tucker Goodrich‏ @TuckerGoodrich 18 Aug 2018
      Replying to @GidMK @drvyom and

      Quit the the simple-minded comparisons. One good epidemiological study doesn't mean they're all good. And certainly doesn't excuse garbage like this, that you nevertheless defend.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 18 Aug 2018
      Replying to @TuckerGoodrich @drvyom and

      Lol, I'm not the one throwing out an entire field of research because a single study has conclusions I don't like Especially when I agree with most of the conclusions except this particular one!

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    10. Tucker Goodrich‏ @TuckerGoodrich 18 Aug 2018
      Replying to @GidMK @drvyom and

      Tucker Goodrich Retweeted Tucker Goodrich

      You're assuming. Not a wise thing to do. I don't like it because it fails to replicate mechanistically.https://twitter.com/TuckerGoodrich/status/862122662671396872?s=19 …

      Tucker Goodrich added,

      Tucker Goodrich @TuckerGoodrich
      "We repeat that figure: 0 out of 52. To put it another way, 100% of the observational claims failed to replicate." https://errorstatistics.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/young-karr-obs-study-problem.pdf …
      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 18 Aug 2018
      Replying to @TuckerGoodrich @drvyom and

      I'm assuming nothing. If you agree that smoking is unhealthy and seatbelts are good, you are fine with epidemiology and its methods You just don't like this study

      4:40 PM - 18 Aug 2018
      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Tucker Goodrich‏ @TuckerGoodrich 18 Aug 2018
          Replying to @GidMK @drvyom and

          You're assuming. You are wrong. Liking a good study doesn't mean you like crappy ones. This fails the most basic test, they didn't eat a physiological amount of food. Hence the data is garbage. You refuse to address that, hence you're a troll.

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Tucker Goodrich‏ @TuckerGoodrich 18 Aug 2018
          Replying to @TuckerGoodrich @GidMK and

          Additionally you have no idea what my thoughts on carbohydrate consumption are. So you're doubly assuming. But please, keep making a spectacle of yourself.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Show replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info