Indeed. I imagine you could get it if you applied to the study authors and had a valid reason, but it wasn't published publicly Standard practice with potentially identifiable patient data such as this. It's usually an ethical requirement, in fact
I'm assuming nothing. If you agree that smoking is unhealthy and seatbelts are good, you are fine with epidemiology and its methods You just don't like this study
-
-
You're assuming. You are wrong. Liking a good study doesn't mean you like crappy ones. This fails the most basic test, they didn't eat a physiological amount of food. Hence the data is garbage. You refuse to address that, hence you're a troll.
-
Additionally you have no idea what my thoughts on carbohydrate consumption are. So you're doubly assuming. But please, keep making a spectacle of yourself.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.