It turns out the removing entire food groups from your diet often results in weightloss, regardless of which food groups they are (with obvious exceptions)
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hahahaha
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Assuming that this involves unprocessed food, we are testing out both fact 1and 2 in real time in my family. So which one is better for health promotion and which one has better compliance/ sustainability?
-
Generally speaking, neither. The best one is the one that works for you. Very few diets are sustainable long term, the trick is to tie it into your life in a sustainable way
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It’s simple arithmetic. Calories in << calories out = weight loss. Calorie source irrelevant. I’m an intermittent faster. Six years. Works for me, but I appreciate that everyone needs to find what works for them.
-
Actually it’s not that simple. The amount of energy expended and efficiency in extracting and utilising the calories IN is very likely NOT the same for everyone.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Are you suggesting someone on SAD would lose weight simply by cutting meat out of their diet?
-
Nope. I'm saying if you overhaul your entire eating pattern and cut calories, it doesn't matter overly much how you do that
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I was vegetarian for a few years and gained weight. Yes I ate more fruits, veggies, and beans. But I filled up on carbs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.