Uh...that report is almost overwhelmingly positive and contains fairly good suggested solutions to the percieved issues. I'm confused how you came to the conclusions in your piece
I'd guess that the ADHA would argue about the relative efficacy of their advertising strategy, and while I haven't found it to be particularly effective I'm not sure it's fair to say that they "didn't engage" in such a campaign
-
-
Moreover, they absolutely did cater to many of the concerns outlined in the report. They had quite extensive pilot schemes that involved attempting to solve many of these issues
-
In fact, many of the security controls currently in MHR appear to be based on such consultations. I do not believe that they were originally included in the PCEHR. The main issue appears to be legislation that the ADHA had no control over set by a previous government!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
All that. Plus in the opt out trials when 50% of indigenous Australians voiced concerns about govt agencies and police access to records they were reassured they could control this in the privacy settings. Dysinformation.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.