The wording of the Act does not forbid sharing, it specifically forbids collection. I.e. just viewing a record inappropriately is a criminal offense
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @GidMK @jehankanga
I mean, it ALSO forbids sharing. But those are actually 2 separate offenses. So if you viewed the info, and shared it, you'd be liable for minimum 2 separate criminal charges
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @jehankanga
You are simply incorrect. It is indeed a criminal offense. I suggest you read the Act.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @jehankanga
As a reference, the specific section of the Act setting out the criminal offencepic.twitter.com/y4EM3XkOZU
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @jehankanga
You are, again, wrong. This relates to any access that is not directly related to a patient's medical care, as set out in Division 2 The act makes no mention of cybercrime specifically, because ANY unapproved access, for any reason, is a criminal offencepic.twitter.com/XtaLbmthQM
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @jehankanga
Lol. Being arrogant and condescending does not change the fact that you are incorrect. You should perhaps read the Act before making statements that are simply wrong
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Every one of the hypotheticals you posed in your thread would constitute a criminal offense, many would be several, and punishable by jail time
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.