The first studies of "diabetes remission" were published well over a decade ago, and none of them used low-carb methodologies But that doesn't fit the narrative, so it's ignored
Eh, not trying to impress anybody. I'm just a bit surprised how you're going in to bat so hard for a private company, in our previous conversations you've always been quite averse to private enterprise!
-
-
Wait, there’s no batting - now concerns me you may be “not batting” on the basis of “for profit” rather than outcomes and cost-effectiveness. That I’ve asked for evidence for your “much cheaper” statement has nothing to do with who I bat for! If I don’t hate, I must love?
-
Ive always been clear - there’s nothing wrong or “bad” by default with making money, nor with writing a book and wanting to sell it. It’s how that money is made. What I have a problem with is the DAA - NFP - having partnerships the terms of which are not disclosed to members
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.