Important point: something can be "evidence-based" and still not be perfect Arguing that something is not "evidence-based" when it very clearly is merely makes you seem disingenuous and/or ignorant
That's also very true. People see a single study as some sort of indelible proof, separate from the many theoretical anchors that actually hold it all in place
-
-
That being said, I'd say tax cuts is a perfect example of where virtually all discussion is theoretical, and the evidence is almost never actually addressed. People debate over trivialities that have long been disproven, rather than looking for factual evidence to make their case
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.