Important point: something can be "evidence-based" and still not be perfect Arguing that something is not "evidence-based" when it very clearly is merely makes you seem disingenuous and/or ignorant
-
-
But the evidence-base of an intervention is separate from its affect. We can argue at length about whether dietary guidelines succeed, or are useful, but calling them evidenceless is simply a factually incorrect thing to say
Show this thread -
A good example, funnily enough, is the ketogenic diet. The evidence base is pretty decent: in theory, it should work. In practice, it doesn't do much better than most other diets
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You can tell people what they should eat. That doesn’t mean they do it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.