This same PhD includes - among other things - an entire 15-page long rant on the Australian government FAQ for their "about vaccination" page It is, in a word, nonsense https://twitter.com/sblambo/status/1009205416046149632 …
The thesis also has an entire section - section 7 - devoted to examining the claims for the efficacy of vaccines THE ENTIRE ARGUMENT: "We haven't done RCTs on vaccinations, therefore they are entirely ineffective"
-
-
Take this section. Among numerous other issues (apparently you can critique the Australian government using the Swedish government's regulator!), the implication that any vaccines are useless if not demonstrated effective in clinical trials is absurdpic.twitter.com/pf2MaWEFAW
Show this thread -
Just underneath is this, presented as an example of 'undone science' Except, of course, there are HUNDREDS of studies looking at infection rates of vaccinated and non-vaccinated individualspic.twitter.com/xg0TX2PAr0
Show this thread -
Another example - if you look at this statement, with academic references, it sounds reasonable. Perhaps Except THE REFERENCES DISAGREE WITH THIS STATEMENTpic.twitter.com/X8J1bmu2hz
Show this thread -
More specifically, none of these references provide evidence that "artificial immunity caused by vaccination causes accelerated autoimmunity" and at least 2 of them specifically state that this is NOT the casepic.twitter.com/swjKtJBYKe
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.