Nah, I'm good. You're not even an emeritus professor, I'm gonna go with the EXPERT and ignore the INEXPERT here because clearly the only thing of importance is titles
Being an expert does not make anyone correct. But by making your argument against him that he is a "boorish oaf" with no expertise, you are simply coming across as a) wrong and b) biased
-
-
There's always at least one qualified person who disagrees with any opinion - there are climate scientists who think the earth is cooling, wrong though they are - but belittling them as fradulent charlatans does nothing but make you seem weirdly biased
-
I think if you examined this far more closely you would find the majority of scientists/medics engaged with practical smoking cessation c/w theoretical,would strongly disagree with SC on his stubborn refusal to accept that RRP exist + can benefit smokers.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.