I don't? As far as I can tell your major objections appear to be glib comments and snide insults, it just seems a waste responding
-
-
Replying to @GidMK @Alan_Beard1
After repeating the same lessons for so long, it becomes hard not to be snarky about it. Your basic sketch was solid. But a lot of the details were wrong, as others have pointed out. That faux hierarchy of epistemology, though, that is the real credibility killer.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @carlvphillips @Alan_Beard1
Whereas expert opinion, long proven to be infallible, is 100% correct and unquestionable Which is why, I assume you follow the exact words of Emeritus Professor Simon Chapman, noted public health expert with decades of experience when it comes to vaping
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @Alan_Beard1
You are really not making a very good case for yourself. There are no such decades. Chapman is not an expert on, well, anything. That is the point. You have to get out of the Dunning-Kruger hole to even know who the experts are. Only then can you sort out the claims.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @carlvphillips @Alan_Beard1
You should definitely tell that to the University of Sydney it sounds like they've made a huge mistake! Or, perhaps, your opinion is INEXPERT and therefore can be ignored with ease
pic.twitter.com/ZuhbOThgki
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @Alan_Beard1
Yeah, you might want to read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @carlvphillips @Alan_Beard1
Nah, I'm good. You're not even an emeritus professor, I'm gonna go with the EXPERT and ignore the INEXPERT here because clearly the only thing of importance is titles
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @Alan_Beard1
No, you are not good. That is the problem here. You are waaay over your head.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @carlvphillips @Alan_Beard1
Man, it would be much easier to trust your opinions if you had an emeritus professorship. I don't believe things written by just anyone, I need an EXPERT!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic or not, but Chapman is a bonkers demagogue, he is literally the last person to listen to about ecigs.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
But he's got all those titles! By Carl's exact words, the only evidence is expert knowledge, and we should completely ignore INEXPERT opinions
-
-
Replying to @GidMK @balbecdaze and
What you are missing is how real expertise is defined. It isn't by how one is labelled.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @stuartf100 @balbecdaze and
You don't think that four decades as a public health expert, including some of the most influential work in smoking prevention, counts as expertise? Certainly an interesting perspective
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.