Whenever you talk about vaping, you see people quoting a figure: 95%. According to SCIENCE, vaping is 95% better for you than smoking Here's a brief tweetorial on why that's wrongpic.twitter.com/j1RJPDLEZD
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
You should definitely tell that to the University of Sydney it sounds like they've made a huge mistake!
Or, perhaps, your opinion is INEXPERT and therefore can be ignored with ease
pic.twitter.com/ZuhbOThgki
Yeah, you might want to read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect …
Nah, I'm good. You're not even an emeritus professor, I'm gonna go with the EXPERT and ignore the INEXPERT here because clearly the only thing of importance is titles
If you had any business writing about this stuff, you would know enough to know who to believe. The fact that you do not know enough, yet you persist in opining, is the problem.
That sounds like a clearly INEXPERT opinion to me! Not even an attempt at factual discourse, no references etc. Perhaps you should get some qualifications or a professorship? I've heard it makes you more reputable and correct!
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.