Whenever you talk about vaping, you see people quoting a figure: 95%. According to SCIENCE, vaping is 95% better for you than smoking Here's a brief tweetorial on why that's wrongpic.twitter.com/j1RJPDLEZD
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I don't? As far as I can tell your major objections appear to be glib comments and snide insults, it just seems a waste responding
After repeating the same lessons for so long, it becomes hard not to be snarky about it. Your basic sketch was solid. But a lot of the details were wrong, as others have pointed out. That faux hierarchy of epistemology, though, that is the real credibility killer.
Whereas expert opinion, long proven to be infallible, is 100% correct and unquestionable Which is why, I assume you follow the exact words of Emeritus Professor Simon Chapman, noted public health expert with decades of experience when it comes to vaping
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.