Maybe check back through - I’ve asked we use the methodology (sub-standard as I think it is) bc we have this data set there to run a series of sensitivity analyses. One of which is “if we took our all industry funded research what does that look like”
You've argued - very strongly I might add - to remove industry funded trials from all current and future research. Seems like a poor position to hold if you aren't sure of the outcome
-
-
That's what I mean about - you can disagree, but from my perspective - asking the question of current and future analysts to consider when making public health decisions about food! If there IS nothing left of the evidence - that in itself is an important finding.
-
It's also a bit unfair to use the word "poor" - I am really not sure what your opposition is to this concept of asking questions of a data-set to know what to do next! That next step needs to be based on evidence?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.