I invite you to look back through our thread. You are pulling out you’re easy wins there. If you were sitting on an NHMRC panel as an epi to discuss how to robust evidence base for ADG ....would you really say “we don’t need to do sensitivity analysis on GRADE, or corp$”
Man, people do love putting words in my mouth. The status quo sucks. Discarding all industry research rather than including it with appropriate caveats is not going to change that
-
-
You're quite good at it too Gid, so take it on the chin
-
I try my best not to do so. If I have, my apologies.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You said "no scientific justification" to taking out industry-funded research and "why not just use current guidelines". I can't interpret that any other way but: industry funded research can be included since we factored its influence and status quo with current guidelines is OK
-
There's a difference between status quo wrt chronic disease (not ok) and the scientific evidence-base of the guidelines (ok) Industry influence is included in grading studies, the NHMRC papers on this are thorough and extremely good
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.