A research question is how the science process starts. "The evidence suggests what we've been doing isn't working. To know how to do better we need to understand what it is we do well". Not sure what other "science" you need here. This is actually a ridiculous conversation
-
-
FRCD is the greatest global threat to health.....why would I not critically review what our default evidence is? "Just use the ADG" for what? I've already said GRADE C is not sufficient to base national food guidelines on (especially where we've not considered adverse outcomes)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Its fine for you to disagree with that....but that doesn't make the proposal "wrong" nor "unscientific" What planet are you on where "everyone is food healthy"? and "healthy choices are easy choices?" there's work to do.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WeDietitians @foodnuthealth
I said none of that? My point is that you've yet to provide a rationale for discarding all industry-funded research. I'd love to see one.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @foodnuthealth
Stop Gid - I've said "if we removed all industry funded studies what would the ADG look like"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Booth, S. (2003). Food Politics: How the food industry influences nutrition and health. Critical Public Health, 13(2), 2. doi:10.1080/0958159031000097616
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Aaron, D. G., & Siegel, M. B. (2016). Sponsorship of national health organizations by two major soda companies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.010 …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Newton, A., Lloyd-Williams, F., Bromley, H., & Capewell, S. (2016). Food for thought? Potential conflicts of interest in academic experts advising governments and charities on dietary policies. BMC public health, 16(735), 8.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Williams, S. N. (2015). The incursion of 'Big Food' in middle-income countries: A qualitative documentary case study analysis of the soft drink industry in China and India. Critical Public Health, 25(4), 18. doi:10.1080/09581596.2015.1005056
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Williams, S. N., & Nestle, M. (2015). 'Big Food': Taking a critical perspective on a global public health problem. Critical Public Health, 25(3), 2. doi:10.1080/09581596.2015.1021298
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
This is all a great rationale for including industry funding as part of an evidential review (as the NHMRC does!) That's not the same as removing all of it from every review
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.