And I’m simply asking for the evidence - we can keep hypothesizing - I’m saying - if we are going to use ADG, please, just have a look. Really don’t know why as an epi person you are putting up barriers?
And, as I've said, you've offered no scientific justification for that question. Why not just use the current guidelines?
-
-
A research question is how the science process starts. "The evidence suggests what we've been doing isn't working. To know how to do better we need to understand what it is we do well". Not sure what other "science" you need here. This is actually a ridiculous conversation
-
FRCD is the greatest global threat to health.....why would I not critically review what our default evidence is? "Just use the ADG" for what? I've already said GRADE C is not sufficient to base national food guidelines on (especially where we've not considered adverse outcomes)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Actually there is a lot of evidence that shows industry influence affects the quality of evidence, how it is interpreted, and also treatment. From big tobacco to pharma. With the epidemic of chronic disease how complacent do you have to be to accept the status quo?
-
Man, people do love putting words in my mouth. The status quo sucks. Discarding all industry research rather than including it with appropriate caveats is not going to change that
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.