And I’m simply asking for the evidence - we can keep hypothesizing - I’m saying - if we are going to use ADG, please, just have a look. Really don’t know why as an epi person you are putting up barriers?
Yes, because it was off-topic and I've already answered that question. But, ok. Yes. Definitely. Most public health interventions are based on Grade C evidence - smoking legislation, seatbelts, some vaccines etc - it's often not possible/ethical to run RCTs on every question!
-
-
Off-topic? You're in my thread! Accepting GRADE C where the objective has not been achieved is another matter. Just bc "other people do it" doesn't mean its ok either. There is nothing more political than food - bc of its "need for survival" it's a different game
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just a reminder here, for anyone else tuning in. Grade C evidence: "Body of evidence provides some support for recommendation(s) but care should be taken in its application". Has sufficient care been taken? Knowing potential for harm, which eminent professors are questioning ADG?
-
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.