I answered. I said - that’s what we need to know - what would the body of evidence look like if we took out industry funded research? Another way to look at it is, if we only accepted Level A & B what would that look like?
What?? Your argument is that the current methodology is wrong. Rephrasing that doesn't change anything...
-
-
Maybe check back through - I’ve asked we use the methodology (sub-standard as I think it is) bc we have this data set there to run a series of sensitivity analyses. One of which is “if we took our all industry funded research what does that look like”
-
Right. But there's no justification - that I can see - for such a project, aside from "industry is bad, duh". So it seems to me that, if the methodology used was evidence-based, the analysis you're proposing would not add to the evidence base
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.