Right now we are using a set of “evidence-based guidelines to tell a population what to eat that are in toto GRADE C evidence”
And, in response to FRCD we are defaulting to these GL as “the way forward”.
If you’re comfortable with that gid, great. I am not. #WeCanDoBetter
Because your argument for why we should exclude an entire category of research is, as far as I can tell, "it's not rocket science/because we can" That's not great methodology, if so. If I'm wrong, please tell me how
-
-
I invite you to look back through our thread. You are pulling out you’re easy wins there. If you were sitting on an NHMRC panel as an epi to discuss how to robust evidence base for ADG ....would you really say “we don’t need to do sensitivity analysis on GRADE, or corp$”
-
I have posed reasonable research questions specific to understanding how we can do better. This is not a methodological conversation, this is a “how can we lift Aus out of this FRCD trajectory”. Corp$ are recognized to influence the narrative. We have a data set to look at this
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.