But justifying a years' long research project requires some scientific backing. What is the evidence that you are basing your rejection of industry-funded research - above and beyond any other source of bias - on?
But, as I've said, there are many sources of bias. Excluding one based on "it's not rocket science" doesn't really make sense Also, I imagine there are many Level A industry-funded studies. That's pretty much the point I'm making here
-
-
In fact, I'd imagine that guidelines based only on A and B evidence would be far more weighted towards industry, because these RCTs are expensive and often run by industry bodies
-
And I’m simply asking for the evidence - we can keep hypothesizing - I’m saying - if we are going to use ADG, please, just have a look. Really don’t know why as an epi person you are putting up barriers?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.