It comes back to the point - what is bias? What is industry influence? How does it affect trials? Your claim is that it makes trials entirely worthless and not worth considering at all. I find that idea unsupported by best evidence
Um, that's not really answering my question. Saying "all industry-funded research is bad" and then justifying it by saying "it's not rocket science" doesn't seem like an evidence-based approach!
-
-
I answered. I said - that’s what we need to know - what would the body of evidence look like if we took out industry funded research? Another way to look at it is, if we only accepted Level A & B what would that look like?
-
Bc, as you know, final recommendations, and pictures of food on a plate, are not fine printed with level of evidence. The public trusts we’ve extended our questioning to put “clean science” forward.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.