I mean, we've argued about that before, but I thought we were discussing industry funding here. We can change the subject if you'd like?
Right, but that's not a justification really. What's the scientific impetus behind your argument? Why is this more important than anything else?
-
-
Right now we are using a set of “evidence-based guidelines to tell a population what to eat that are in toto GRADE C evidence” And, in response to FRCD we are defaulting to these GL as “the way forward”. If you’re comfortable with that gid, great. I am not.
#WeCanDoBetter -
I mean, still totally off topic. Let me rephrase: why are you asking to exclude any industry-funded research from any evidence reviews? If anything, this would likely lower the quality of the review!
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.