TW: I’m just going to do a little appeal to cv Gid, I’ve taught epi & biostats, translation to practice, and one on one for SR&MA. As a private consultant I did SR&MA for years. Now that’s out of the way...
But justifying a years' long research project requires some scientific backing. What is the evidence that you are basing your rejection of industry-funded research - above and beyond any other source of bias - on?
-
-
As I’ve said....this is not some year 10 project proposal, this is an investment in public health. The entire ADG cost 2.1milln. That’s cheap. As I also said Australia’s food-health is at stake.
#WeCanDoBetter -
Right, but that's not a justification really. What's the scientific impetus behind your argument? Why is this more important than anything else?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.