If I were a member of the public in Australia (which I am) I would be outraged to know how much "vested interest" has gone into our national food guidelines. Especially under these circumstances where our collective public food-health policies have not met their objective!https://twitter.com/rosestant70/status/1004562511205560321 …
I mean, we've argued about that before, but I thought we were discussing industry funding here. We can change the subject if you'd like?
-
-
We are talking about doing a sensitivity analysis of a data set that includes “only studies not industry funded”. You are suggesting such a task impractical, not warranted, agenda-loaded, and “where do you draw the line”...on the basis of methodology! Here’s the thing
-
The question “what would the ADG look like if we excluded industry funded studies?” To answer that question (which we can) one selects the best methodology. It appears you are saying the methodology is so intricately flawed it’s not worth pulling that thread?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
as a first step. It will be time consuming thought bc the "spreadsheet" of evidence did not identify "industry funded" as yes/no.
. So why didn't they include that info in the SR?