If I were a member of the public in Australia (which I am) I would be outraged to know how much "vested interest" has gone into our national food guidelines. Especially under these circumstances where our collective public food-health policies have not met their objective!https://twitter.com/rosestant70/status/1004562511205560321 …
So why are you picking out industry funding as a source of bias? The evidence suggests it's no worse than many other issues with research, seems like an ideological rather than evidential issue to me
-
-
Bc 1) we can 2) we should 3) the ADG are the evidence-base for generations of health professionals and public health policy 4) the public deserves this clarity 5) the socio-political landscape demands
#WeCanDoBetter 6) your epi tweets indicate “best methodology” is not= “robust” -
Why should we? What's the basis of that argument?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
as a first step. It will be time consuming thought bc the "spreadsheet" of evidence did not identify "industry funded" as yes/no.
. So why didn't they include that info in the SR?