If I were a member of the public in Australia (which I am) I would be outraged to know how much "vested interest" has gone into our national food guidelines. Especially under these circumstances where our collective public food-health policies have not met their objective!https://twitter.com/rosestant70/status/1004562511205560321 …
It's not a hole in the methodology. the bias is taken into account in the grading - industry funding would push the score down somewhat, alongside other things that might push it up Cochrane has some great documents if you're interested in how it works http://training.cochrane.org/resource/grade-handbook …
-
-
TW: I’m just going to do a little appeal to cv Gid, I’ve taught epi & biostats, translation to practice, and one on one for SR&MA. As a private consultant I did SR&MA for years. Now that’s out of the way...
-
So why are you picking out industry funding as a source of bias? The evidence suggests it's no worse than many other issues with research, seems like an ideological rather than evidential issue to me
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
as a first step. It will be time consuming thought bc the "spreadsheet" of evidence did not identify "industry funded" as yes/no.
. So why didn't they include that info in the SR?