Fantastic take down of debunker debunker, @drjasonfung's, twisted logic by @gorskon: "An unholy combination of methodolatry and quackery apologia—with jade eggs" https://respectfulinsolence.com/2018/05/30/an-unholy-combination-of-methodolatry-and-quackery-apologia-with-jade-eggs/ … @DrJenGunter @TheSciBabe @McGillOSS @crackedscience @skepticpedi @HealthWatch123 @GidMK
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @OccupyBrampton @CaulfieldTim and
I know I won't change. your mind, Christine, but to anyone on the fence reading this, here's why refuting "energy medicine" is quite literally child's play:https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/187390 …
5 replies 8 retweets 20 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @OccupyBrampton @crackedscience and
This is an almost perfect example of the exact phenomenon that
@gorskon was talking about above. Not every study needs a control group. Insisting on one in every instance is methodologically flawed2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @OccupyBrampton @CaulfieldTim and
Of course. Because this type of study doesn't look at "benefit". It is looking at whether the basic tenet of reiki is POSSIBLE, and failed to prove that it was.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @OccupyBrampton @CaulfieldTim and
Most reiki practitioners claim to be able to sense some sort of energy field. This study found no evidence that any of a large number of practitioners could detect such a field. That is the basic tenet we are talking about
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.