If I were a member of the public in Australia (which I am) I would be outraged to know how much "vested interest" has gone into our national food guidelines. Especially under these circumstances where our collective public food-health policies have not met their objective!https://twitter.com/rosestant70/status/1004562511205560321 …
That's ok I take your point. I've muted several people recently who descended to childish insults and taunts rather than discussion
-
-
Well at least mine wasn't childish right?

-
It is also frustrating, the people who are pushing ADG selectively respond to questions and comments. That too is disingenuous, disappointing, and gives nothing to "how to move forward". They are not discussions if you pick out the bits that suit right?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But I would question the reasonableness of excluding all industry-funded research a priori given that this is not the norm anywhere in public health research for a good reason: bias is too complex to single out a specific piece like that
-
That is one bias that is obvious, universal, easiest to identify. Reasons not to do it do not out weight the benefit in current socio-political food-health landscapes. If we didn't have the highest rate of food-related chronic disease, you may have a point.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
as a first step. It will be time consuming thought bc the "spreadsheet" of evidence did not identify "industry funded" as yes/no.