The sheer technical potential of carbon removal in CA is massive (100M tons CO2 annually). The majority (80%) of that potential comes from engineered solutions (biomass conversion + DAC).
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
That technical reality lies in stark contrast to many of the conversations I've had with ENGOs working in the state who focus mostly on natural solutions.
Prikaži ovu nit -
2) If you look at the geologic storage potential in CA, it is very clear that the CA Central Valley will bear the brunt of the implementation of engineered carbon removal solutions. This isn't only a technical problem, but also a social and political one.pic.twitter.com/TFJs3BrZFd
Prikaži ovu nit -
CA Central Valley (where I'm from) is already facing significant climate risk, high unemployment rates, poor air quality, and other environmental harms. We need to not only work on the ground with EJ and frontline communities to mitigate risk/set conditions for implementation...
Prikaži ovu nit -
But also understand where the synergies are with the other goals of the CV. NEWAYZ I need to go to a meeting but the point is: 1) we need to start these on-the-ground dialogues today AND 2) we need support more social science and policy research.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
)